Hec ras cross section spacing

Cross-sectional cut lines should be created to capture the entire extent of flooding anticipated by the dam break scenario. As in any hydraulic modeling study, cross sections must be laid out to accurately describe the channel and floodplain geometry, hec ras cross section spacing. Cross sections are laid out perpendicular to the anticipated flow lines of both the channel and the floodplain, during high flow conditions.

Boundary geometry for the analysis of flow in natural streams is specified in terms of ground surface profiles cross sections and the measured distances between them reach lengths. Cross sections are located at intervals along a stream to characterize the flow carrying capability of the stream and its adjacent floodplain. They should extend across the entire floodplain and should be perpendicular to the anticipated flow lines. Occasionally it is necessary to layout cross-sections in a curved or dogleg alignment to meet this requirement. Every effort should be made to obtain cross sections that accurately represent the stream and floodplain geometry. An example of laying out cross sections is shown below in the figure below. The general approach to laying out cross sections is to ensure that the cross sections are perpendicular to the flow lines.

Hec ras cross section spacing

We have received your request and will respond promptly. Log In. Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community. It's easy to join and it's free. Register now while it's still free! Already a member? Close this window and log in. Join Us Close. Are you an Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums! Join Us!

Are you utilizing levees and ineffective flow areas? As I understand it, that would get RAS to properly evaluate the assumption of no short circuit flow through the floodplain. Dam Break.

Written by Chris Goodell December 2, Written by Chris Goodell, P. All rights reserved. So the question was, which depth do you use? His switch to bankful depth for his final equation is two-fold. One for convenience a depth characteristic is easier to measure in the field than hydraulic radius , but also because bankful depth typically yields the maximum hydraulic radius for typical flood flows in a natural channel. That being said when running extreme events in HEC-RAS, such as a dam breach, more consideration for a larger depth should be given.

Cross-sectional cut lines should be created to capture the entire extent of flooding anticipated by the dam break scenario. As in any hydraulic modeling study, cross sections must be laid out to accurately describe the channel and floodplain geometry. Cross sections are laid out perpendicular to the anticipated flow lines of both the channel and the floodplain, during high flow conditions. Cross sections also need to be added immediately upstream and downstream of: tributary inflow locations; dams and other inline structures weirs, drop structures, or natural drops in the bed profile ; bridge and culvert crossings; levees and other types of lateral hydraulic structures. An example of a cross section layout is shown in the figure below. In addition to describing the physical changes and hydraulic structures within the channel and floodplain, there are also numerical considerations for adding or removing cross sections. In general, cross sections spaced too far apart will cause additional numerical diffusion of the floodwave, due to the derivatives with respect to distance being averaged over too long of a distance. See an example of artificial numerical diffusion in the figure above. In this example, the channel is a rectangular channel on a constant slope, with a constant Manning's roughness.

Hec ras cross section spacing

Written by Chris Goodell October 8, Either way, approaching an unsteady HEC-RAS model especially a dynamic one as a beginner with little experience and understanding of how to stabilize it can cause significant delays in your project and worse, completely blow up your budget. Although the model ran to completion without crashing, it had unacceptably high errors.

Hq por n

For the past many days I have been trying various options but all in vain. This requires an estimation of what the flow lines will look like in the overbank areas away from the main channel. The Samuels equation implies that smaller streams and steeper streams will require tighter cross section spacing. If that's not it, I'm afraid I won't be of much help. Ideally these would be equal and you'd have an error of "0". Chris G. Peak discharge of your inflow hydrograph is around cfs. I have labeled this cross section "problem cross section" in my picture. That version is referenced in my grad open channel flow text Sturm which I also highly recommend. You might also try a computer reboot too, if the first suggestion doesn't work. Each data point in the cross section is given a station number corresponding to the horizontal distance from a starting point on the left. The purpose of the study also affects spacing of cross sections. Please suggest me solutions Chris Goodell on March 5, that is more of a note, than an error. If the geometry of channel would allow for this assumption very time, it'd be a good way to cut cross sections for most projects. See message below please….

Written by Chris Goodell May 19, Each post will discuss a feature in the menu items, starting with the Tools menu item in the Geometry Schematic.

Just to be safe, I put 30 cfs in the initial flow input box as well. You might also try a computer reboot too, if the first suggestion doesn't work. Is it modeling mistake or related to something else. Samuels' and Dr. Anyway, to answer your question, not really. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. That suggests a time step of 8. However, the first time step flow is very low at 0. Using the graphical cross section editor, I redefined the bank stations to get rid of this problem. Especially if you are running in unsteady flow. It's an exercise of "guessing" a water surface elevation to solve the equations then comparing the resulting water surface elevation with the "guess". Generally cross sections should be cut at locations where it is aniticipated that there will be a significant change in the flow profile, i.