Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

Be the first.

Hi Folks, I have been looking for an upgrade lens for lightning photography. Have been using the mm kit lens with my D Will these lenses work on the D? Is there anything I should be aware of before making an upgrade? One YouTube reviewer mentioned that the mm can have lens creep. Most of the time my camera is pointed upward toward the sky.

Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

When the D came out and I started using it with the kit I was stunned at how soft the images were. I thought for sure I had gotten a bad copy of the kit so I went down to the camera store and tried a different one and then I tried another and they were all equally bad. I popped on my favorite prime lens and the difference was huge- Grand Canyon huge. In the past I have not typically been a kit basher, there are those out there that say the kit lens is horrible, just buy the body and get a prime or other, better quality, lens and I often disagree with this approach, especially for people new to DSLRS. After my experience I advised anyone buying the D to skip the and get the or consider some alternatives Recommended Lenses for Nikon DX Cameras. The is a better lens, it out performs the easily but especially now that Nikon has dropped their AA filter, a filter that actually blurs the image slightly to avoid moire, in the D and now the D - they really needed a good lens to include with these cameras. Is the that lens? It is or nothing. So how does it compare to the ? The is on the left and the is on the right in all samples below. Watch my video discussing the differences seen below More sample images with the and the Nikon D Final Verdict - Bought with the D or D this lens compliments the sensor of those cameras nicely and provides a good compromise between quality and convenience. However, it is still a kit lens and you might consider other options if you need to frequently shoot in lower light or want to create those images with the blurred background.

It is so much easier to use. I have a Nikon D with kit lens.

Group Since Sep 28, Save Cancel Drag to set position! Overview Discussions Photos Members Map. Sorry for any cross posting I have a Nikon D with kit lens. I'd like a little more flexibility in the range and am considering getting an I'd really like to know people's thoughts.

The integration of an ultra-compact Silent Wave Motor ensures fast, quiet and accurate autofocus operation, and complements the lens' compact form factor. The lens is designed to fit a camera with an APS-C ''subframe'' sensor, so while it will mount on Nikon film or FX digital bodies, it will show obvious vignetting when set to any focal length. Small and light, the mm represents a field of view of approximately mm in 35mm terms. To economize and create a more efficient design, the lens is equipped with a variable aperture; as the zoom extends the focal length, both the smallest and the largest apertures change. The following chart represents the largest and smallest apertures you can expect at a given focal length:. The lens is equipped with Nikon's vibration reduction VR technology, advertising a hand-holding improvement of up to three stops.

Nikon 18 105 vs 18 140

For a full list of the technical specifications please refer to the product manual. Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Adirondack daily enterprise

Distortion in the lens refers to the variation of magnification throughout the image. This measurement is important to take into account when buying filters. Maybe I just like the lens! I've used it on the D, and it was quite happy there. Image quality? Make sure you know all the terminology for any brand, as in some cases similar sounding lenses may have different AF mechanisms and the like. Similar to the number of aperture blades, rounded blades affect the way the light gets through to the sensor. I've used them both. The point is, what works best for you. Need suggestion as you expert. Nikon vs Last Name. I popped on my favorite prime lens and the difference was huge- Grand Canyon huge. About its only drawback is linear distortion which is a non-issue for fireworks.

Forums New posts Search forums.

Geoff J Pekor 2 years ago. The had good reviews. I had a well-used gray market one of these and it served well, but it did have a back-focus issue making it less than stellar on the D About a couple of years ago I bought the VR at a most reasonable price and in excellent condition. It is or nothing. Maybe I got a bad one, maybe that was why it was on Craigslist, but I would not want to take that lens on a trip and come home with sub-optimal results. If the financial considerations are moot, then look at it this way: you can always use the to achieve a focal length of but there is no way you can zoom to with the Any zoom can have lens creep, but rotating zooms will generally do better than push-pull. The differences are obviously a bit more reach, and the has a metal mount. I shot my recent thread In an Odd Light with an on a D2x. I must say that I shoot JPEG Fine, not RAW, so my post-edit abilities are also probably hurting my images more than helping lol Anyways, it's a decent all-around lens imo, and has excellent macro abilities as a very convenient option by throwing on a Raynox and using a nice diffuser. Another advantage is that with a smaller aperture you get a greater depth of field, and can keep all of the image in focus. All my macro is done using this lens as well with just a Raynox x on it. These are used to block strong light sources, such as the sun, from the lens to prevent glare and lens flare. I have been looking forward to your advice.