Piracy reddit

Reddit doesn't have to identify eight anonymous users who wrote comments in piracy reddit threads, a judge in the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled on Friday.

.

Piracy reddit

.

US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler quashed a subpoena issued by film studios in an order that agrees with Reddit that the First Amendment protects the users' right to speak piracy reddit online. Channel Ars Technica.

.

Even if you've never used Reddit , you've no doubt heard of it; it's one of the largest sites in the US , and with more than 2 million "subreddits," it has a stunning depth and breadth of content. With all that activity, it's not surprising that Reddit has become a hub for digital piracy , and the site has struggled with managing copyright violations for several years. With more than , members, it was created in with the mission of being "a community dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy," according to its own description. That you can find discussions of the vulnerabilities of piracy laws on Reddit is unsurprising. Given the subject matter, the piracy subreddit attempts to thread a particularly precarious needle. According to the rules of the subreddit, "submissions must be related to the discussion of digital piracy. Reddit has been attempting to address piracy on its platform for several years, with serious efforts to mitigate copyright infringement beginning around Policing it is extraordinarily difficult. In Reddit's transparency reporting , it's clear that the platform has been increasing its content monitoring exponentially. In , Reddit received 9, copyright notices, which resulted in 26, content removals.

Piracy reddit

Film studios that filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against a cable Internet provider are trying to force Reddit to identify users who posted comments about piracy. In an attempt to prove that RCN turned a blind eye to users downloading copyrighted movies, the plaintiffs sent a subpoena to Reddit last month seeking identifying information for nine users. Reddit's response provided at least some information about one user but no information on any of the other eight. According to the film studios, Reddit argued that "the requests for identifying information associated with the additional eight accounts are more in the nature of a fishing expedition and are neither relevant nor permissible under the First Amendment. Now, the studios want a federal court to force Reddit's hand. The latest filing and the ongoing dispute over the subpoena were detailed in a TorrentFreak article published Saturday. The Reddit users' comments allegedly "establish that RCN has not reasonably implemented a policy for terminating repeat infringers," that "RCN controls the conduct of its subscribers and monitors its subscribers' access," and "establish that the ability to freely pirate without consequence was a draw to becoming a subscriber of RCN. For example, the filmmakers want to identify Reddit user ChikaraFan because the user once wrote that "RCN seems fairly lax I looked up before I switched and had little trouble.

Imagenes de shell

The court denies the motion to compel and quashes the subpoena because on this record, the First Amendment bars the discovery. After reviewing the facts and arguments, she found that the Reddit users' comments were irrelevant to the film studios' underlying case and that the studios could obtain relevant information from other sources. The plaintiffs, attempting to prove that RCN "ignores piracy on its network" and is thus liable for its users' copyright infringement, "subpoenaed non-party Reddit for identifying information for eight Reddit users' accounts and then moved to compel Reddit's compliance after Reddit objected," Beeler wrote. Jon Brodkin Jon has been a reporter for Ars Technica since and covers a wide array of telecom and tech policy topics. US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler quashed a subpoena issued by film studios in an order that agrees with Reddit that the First Amendment protects the users' right to speak anonymously online. The First Amendment right to anonymous speech is not absolute, but the precedent followed by US district courts only forces disclosure of anonymous users' identities "in the exceptional case where the compelling need for the discovery sought outweighs the First Amendment rights of the anonymous speaker," Beeler noted. Plaintiffs are far from meeting that strict standard here. Plaintiffs are far from meeting that strict standard here. After reviewing the facts and arguments, she found that the Reddit users' comments were irrelevant to the film studios' underlying case and that the studios could obtain relevant information from other sources. Rather, Plaintiffs just wish to discuss the comments the subscribers made and use their comments as evidence that RCN monitors and controls the conduct of its subscribers, RCN has no meaningful policy for terminating repeat infringers, and this lax or no policy was a draw for using RCN's service. Jon Brodkin Jon has been a reporter for Ars Technica since and covers a wide array of telecom and tech policy topics.

Even if you've never used Reddit , you've no doubt heard of it; it's one of the largest sites in the US , and with more than 2 million "subreddits," it has a stunning depth and breadth of content.

In an attempt to prove that RCN now known as Astound Broadband turned a blind eye to customers illegally downloading copyrighted movies, the studios subpoenaed Reddit seeking identifying information for specific users who commented in piracy-related threads. After reviewing the facts and arguments, she found that the Reddit users' comments were irrelevant to the film studios' underlying case and that the studios could obtain relevant information from other sources. Skip to main content Enlarge. As Reddit previously argued, "Courts have long recognized that the First Amendment protects online anonymity and have established a stringent standard to use in precisely this scenario, where a litigant seeks to unmask users for the purpose of providing evidence in litigation that does not involve those users In an attempt to prove that RCN now known as Astound Broadband turned a blind eye to customers illegally downloading copyrighted movies, the studios subpoenaed Reddit seeking identifying information for specific users who commented in piracy-related threads. The court denies the motion to compel and quashes the subpoena because on this record, the First Amendment bars the discovery. The studios filed a motion to compel Reddit to respond to the subpoena after Reddit refused to identify eight of the nine users. Reddit has no involvement in the underlying case, which is a copyright lawsuit in a different federal court against cable Internet service provider RCN. The court denies the motion to compel and quashes the subpoena because on this record, the First Amendment bars the discovery. US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler quashed a subpoena issued by film studios in an order that agrees with Reddit that the First Amendment protects the users' right to speak anonymously online. Reddit doesn't have to identify eight anonymous users who wrote comments in piracy-related threads, a judge in the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled on Friday. Channel Ars Technica. Jon graduated from Boston University with a degree in journalism and has been a full-time journalist for over 20 years. After reviewing the facts and arguments, she found that the Reddit users' comments were irrelevant to the film studios' underlying case and that the studios could obtain relevant information from other sources. Channel Ars Technica.