Tom nichols twitter

Thread Reader. Share this page! More info at Twitter Help. Tom Nichols.

Tom Nichols, a Harvard professor and former Lincoln Project adviser who spends hours on social media proclaiming his moral and intellectual superiority over his fellow Americans, is in hot water after staying up way past his bedtime and announcing his "crush" on a much younger woman. He included a screenshot of a television ad for Purple mattresses starring actress Mallory Everton, She is dressed in provocative dirndl for the role, which appears to be based on the "Goldilocks and the Three Bears" fairy tale about a little girl who trespasses in the woods. Nichols, who is married, will celebrate his 61st birthday on Dec. He is the author of The Death of Expertise , a lamentation on the fact that "average citizens believe themselves to be on an equal intellectual footing" with people like Tom Nichols. In an effort to establish his intellectual bona fides, the ex-Lincoln Project guru has tweeted more than , times since joining the social networking website as RadioFreeTom in January , which works out to an average of more than tweets per day. That is way too many tweets for an adult man to be posting on a daily basis, a Washington Free Beacon analysis has determined.

Tom nichols twitter

It is something I think should be read by everyone here. Thread Reader did an unroll of the Twitter thread, and that is what I have posted beneath the fold. Tom Nichols responds to Bret Stephens with an incredible Twitter thread. Saturday, Jul. Bret Stephens wrote an obnoxious column, to which I will not link. I have given you his picture. He has quite the Twitter following with over K followers. He posts as RadioFreeTom. Nichols was a conservative national security type. He is strongly opposed to Trump. Yes, I read the Bret Stephens piece. Ho hum. Yes, the intolerant left is a threat. However, I have excoriated people on the left for most of my career.

Yeah, I'll get right on that as soon as we dislodge the febrile anti-constitutionalists of the GOP. Twitter can be a great place tom nichols twitter practice some skills that also serve us well in real life. However, I have excoriated people on the left for most of my career.

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. First, here are three new stories from The Atlantic. Elon Musk finally bought Twitter—or, as it turned out, was essentially forced to buy Twitter after shooting his mouth off about how keen he was to own it. He is now learning that contracts matter, and that this whole fandango was probably a stupid idea; his first three days at the helm have not, shall we say, inspired a lot of confidence in his managerial acumen. It is not logical, but it is often true.

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. But first, here are three new stories from The Atlantic. Donald Trump went to CPAC and gave a speech that was, even by his delusional standards, dark and violent. Much of it was hallucinatory. He is as dangerous as ever to our democracy and to our national security. How do we turn the discussion away from partisanship and toward good citizenship—and to the protection of our constitutional order? In the past, reporters have approached such questions gingerly, poking their head into coffee shops, asking for comments at rallies, and claiming to overhear conversations at gas stations, all in the service of trying to understand Trump voters.

Tom nichols twitter

For most of my career, I have been a specialist in national security affairs, a cheerless area of study. And yet nothing was more difficult than writing about democracy in my own country. In the past, I brought — I hope — a scholarly and dispassionate eye to unpleasant subjects. Now, I was anguished. I was no longer writing about notional future wars or the faraway Russians. Now I was writing about my own people: my fellow citizens, my friends, my neighbors, my family. The people I have always counted on to be patriotic, sensible, and steady — like our ancestors had been under far more trying circumstances than our own — were now sirens of drama and complaint. These, they were sure, are the worst times ever.

Atmosphere lamp

It's a list of reasons never to use force unless you can win instantly against a weak enemy and achieve a totally clear objective in a popular war. Each time I see a story like this, it's a reminder that there is no actual Russian strategic goal in this war: The idea of "defeating" Ukraine and capturing it whole went down the tubes over a year ago. I say this as a holder of one of them. It's child-like, the political version of Oppositional Defiance Disorder. Perfectly legit q, and happy to answer it. For years I've watched college kids latch on to one cause after another. President" is not only discretionary, but it's actually by old school etiquette incorrect. What are they, then? It is not logical, but it is often true. It was the right thing to do.

This article was featured in One Story to Read Today, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a single must-read from The Atlantic , Monday through Friday.

It's that simple. For years, I was an outspoken conservative. If your replacement for Christian worship is a Trump rally, maybe church-going wasn't about Christ. Twitter, so far, is still Twitter: infuriating and fascinating, disgusting and enlightening, full of very nice people and intelligent interlocutors, along with the usual cohort of angry losers, bored juveniles, and wannabe keyboard heroes. I've been hearing about leftists taking over the country since I was a kid. Many are the children of privilege. Here's an open secret: most GOPers never really cared that much about the culture war. I'm going to go all Emily Post here and say that some titles are lifetime titles as a matter of protocol and respect, rather than right granted by the government. It's a list of reasons never to use force unless you can win instantly against a weak enemy and achieve a totally clear objective in a popular war. Have to disagree with my friend KoriSchake here.