Tug normative values

Purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the Victorinox inox automatic for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade agestug normative values, years were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of tug normative values chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age.

The TUG test provides a measure of global ambulation skills and its total score has been successfully related with functionality and other important health variables in older adults. Reliable norms are needed for adults 50 years and older that allow the early identification and intervention in motor disturbances. The study was carried out with adults from Galicia and Valencia living in the community. A total of Spanish community-living participants, aged from 50 to 90 years and functionality preserved were assessed through the implementation of a cross-sectional design. Health, comorbidity, physical activity, cognitive status, functionality measures and TUG test scores were obtained. TUG scores were successfully predicted by age and gender, and significantly correlated with cognitive status and comorbidity. TUG norms were calculated by age-group for women and men.

Tug normative values

Background and purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is widely employed in the examination of elders, but definitive normative reference values are lacking. This meta-analysis provided such values by consolidating data from multiple studies. Methods: Studies reporting TUG times for apparently healthy elders were identified through the on-line search of bibliographic databases. Study specifics and data were consolidated and examined for homogeneity. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Although the data contributing to this mean were homogeneous, data for individuals who could be categorized by age were more homogeneous. Conclusions: The reference values presented, though obtained from studies with clear differences, provide a standard to which patient performance can be compared. Patients whose performance exceeds the upper limit of reported confidence intervals can be considered to have worse than average performance. Abstract Background and purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is widely employed in the examination of elders, but definitive normative reference values are lacking. Publication types Meta-Analysis.

Exportar referencia.

Toll-Free U. Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life. Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. Instrument Details. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process. Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary?

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade ages , , , years were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors. Unfortunately, time constraints, insufficient space, or inability to interpret results due to a lack of normative reference values NRV have contributed to inadequate assessment and monitoring of physical activity in primary care.

Tug normative values

Simple test used to estimate the risk of falls. The Timed Up and Go test, also known as the TUG test, is a simple evaluative test used to measure your functional mobility. The TUG test measures how long it takes you to stand up, walk a distance of 10 feet, turn, walk back, and sit down again. The TUG test is most often used in physical therapy to give your therapist an idea of how safely you can move around. It can also be used by your healthcare provider to estimate your risk of falling and your ability to maintain balance while walking. This article looks at the TUG test, its purpose, and how results are interpreted. The TUG test can help a healthcare provider understand how well you are able to get around.

Sob vs nos dream11 prediction today

Learn more about the conditions we treat , the continuing education courses and credits provided and about career opportunities. Interventions to improve walking in older adults. Leon, G. Differences increased when average time needed to perform test increased. A healthier sample with higher levels of functionality in the participants of our study may explain this disparity in the results. Ferrucci, C. Balash, Y. Ng, S. A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Webber, M. Find it on PubMed Morris, S. Porter, V. Podsiadlo, S. Find it on PubMed Ng, S. BMC Geriatr, 14 , pp.

Toll-Free U.

AbilityLab menu. Lojo-Seoane, J. Pereiro, S. Rockwood, K. Ales, C. A healthier sample with higher levels of functionality in the participants of our study may explain this disparity in the results. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Ramos-Lema, C. Mobility limitations in the medicare population: prevalence and sociodemographic and clinical correlates. Low—moderate: